Protect Yourself Legally with an Autoresponder Service

June 19th, 2008

Another powerful reason for making the switch from using
the unlimited autoresponders that come free with your web
hosting account to paying a monthly fee for an
autoresponder service is improved legal protection.

Since all e-mails you send using a paid autoresponder
service are hosted on their servers, you are insulated
from false accusations of sending spam (unsolicited
commercial e-mail).

Even if you send your paid autoresponder service your list
of current newsletter subscribers, they will require
confirmation from each subscriber.

A subscriber to my newsletter confirmed their subscription
(with date, time, and IP address recorded) through my
paid autoresponder service. Then, with the first issue
sent her, she filed a spam complaint with AOL (America
Online, Inc.). My autoresponder service terminated her
subscription and notified me of what happened.

Now, had I still been using my free mailing list software
(and the free autoresponders) that came with my web
hosting, I might never had known what happened. I would
have assumed that my subscriber was getting my newsletter
and was happy about it. I would never have imagined that
I was being accused of sending spam and at risk of being
blacklisted!

As well, compliance with the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003
(Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and
Marketing Act of 2003, United States Public Law 108-187)
is ensured by the paid autoresponder services. They make
sure that legally required information is sent on each
e-mail sent.

So, by paying a modest monthly fee, your autoresponder
service can not only help increase your profits but it
can help protect you legally as well.

RESOURCE BOX:

J. Stephen Pope, President of Pope Consulting Inc.,
has been helping clients to earn maximum business profits
for over twenty-five years.

For profitable Work at Home Small Business Ideas, visit
http://www.yenommarketinginc.com/

To see how autoresponder services can improve your profits,
visit http://www.yenommarketinginc.com/autoresponders.html

Tags: , ,

Why Does FACTA Matter to Me

June 18th, 2008

FACTA stands for Fair and Accurate Credit Transaction Act. FACTA is the law which allows any American access to their credit report once per year. The law went into effect Jan. 1, 2005. So what does that mean for you as an employer?

On June 1, 2005, a new provision of FACTA goes into effect. It says that any employer (even if you only employ one person, and you have their personal information so that you can pay social security taxes,) whose action or inaction results in the loss of employee information, can be fined by federal and state government, and sued in civil court.

A USA Today article on FACTA from Jan. 14. 2005, stated “Bet you didn’t know that.” But you need to know, and need to know what you can do to protect yourself.

Small Businesses affected the most

‘”A small businessman who makes a mistake could bear the brunt of a regulation like this,” says James Plummer, policy analyst at Consumer Alert, a non-profit group that focuses on a free-market approach to consumer regulations.’

The USA Today article goes on to say that “if you don’t shred and information gets out, there are penalties.” But what if you do shred all potential employee information, and take all necessary precautions to protect your past, current, and future employees’ identities, and the information still gets out somehow? Under FACTA, you could still be held responsible.

You may not think information theft could happen to you, but neither did this short list of companies, universities, government institutions, and businesses that have had employee or customer information stolen from them:

DSW Shoe Warehouse

Lexis Nexis

University of Northern Colorado

California State University (Chico)

University of California - Berkeley

University of Maryland

Las Vegas Department of Motor Vehicles

Bank of America

Choice Point

Weld County (CO) Employees (information stolen by an inmate while in jail)

How can you, as an employer, minimize your liability?

There are hundreds of things you can do to minimize liability, which are probably things you already do. Document shredding, redaction of electronically stored information, careful screening of employees who will be coming into contact with personal information of customers and employees, physically locking file drawers with sensitive information, and setting up firewalls on computer equipment connected to the Internet, among hundreds of other solutions, are all good ideas.

The old saying that an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure is definitely the case when it comes to securing personal information. However, no matter what prevention steps you take, there is no 100% effective way to be sure that employee’s information won’t be compromised. Even if the information doesn’t get out from your company, an employee can claim that it did.

That’s a scary thought! What if an employee claims that their information was stolen through the actions of your company, but there’s no real proof to back it up? You will end up hiring (or using) an attorney to represent and defend your company in court. At $150 - $200/hour for most attorneys across the United States, how long can you afford to defend your company?

So what can you do?

The only sure solution, or at least the only solution that would at least provide an affirmative defense against the fines, fees, and lawsuits you could incur as an employer, is to offer some sort of Identity Theft protection as a benefit to your employees.

As an employer, you can choose whether or not to pay for this added benefit. However, the most important thing you can do is to make the protection available, and have a mandatory employee meeting, similar to what you probably already do for health insurance, to help employees understand Identity Theft and the protection that you are making available to them. When you make the protection available, and when your employees have been educated on the dangers of Identity Theft, they can either elect to have identity theft coverage as a benefit, or they can decline the coverage as a benefit.

If the employee has Identity Theft coverage and becomes a victim, it is beneficial to your business, because an employee with Identity Theft coverage will spend less time, less money, and will experience less frustration while trying to have their information restored. This will get them back on the job and focused on work more quickly.

If the employee declines the coverage, and later claims that the information was stolen as a result of you or your company’s actions, you have a piece of paper, with their signature, saying that they attended the presentation and declined the coverage.

Choosing to not make Identity Theft coverage available leaves you exposed to an unlimited dollar amount that you can be sued for under civil liability, federal fines of up to $2,500.00 per employee per incident, and state fines of up to $1,000.00 per employee per incident.

Recommended course of action? Have a benefits consultant who offers an Identity Theft protection plan present to your employees. Help them set up a 20 minute presentation with your employees, and make it mandatory that all employees attend. You want your employees to be protected from this awful crime. If they choose not to be, but you’ve given the option of being protected, then the liability becomes theirs, not yours, when they become a victim of identity theft.

Jonathan Kraft is a benefits consultant who specializes in educating people about how they can get affordable access to the legal system. Because of his work in the field of electronic Identity Theft, he has come to be known as Colorado’s Foremost Expert on Computer Related Identity Theft. To schedule a time for Mr. Kraft to present Identity Theft and Legal Service protection to your employees, please contact him at (877) 825-7119. You can also find out more on the web at http://www.strive4impact.com/group

Tags: , , , , , ,

How to Buy Property in Chile The Legal Issues

June 17th, 2008

Well, like most things related to law, the devil is in the details.

There is more than a little confusion on the Internet about how to buy property in Chile as a foreigner. There are many articles dealing with all the great deals in Chile, which often include a few fuzzy details about the legal requirements, but a surprising few that really dig into the detailed legal issues involved. Here we hope to sort out a few of the misconceptions, but certainly not all of them, when it comes to buying property in Chile as a foreigner. In this article we touch on the basics of the procedures, the Cost, the contract requirements, and the difference between a RUT and RUN ID systems that are required to purchase a property in Chile.

1.Purchase and Sale Contract in the Chilean Legal System
The contract of purchase and sale is regulated by the Civil Code articles Art. 1793 through 1896. This contract is usually consensual, (it exist and has legal authority from the moment the buyer and seller agree what to sell -the thing- and for how much-the price) except in those cases where the law requires certain formalities. In the case of real estate, article 1801 of the Chilean Civil Code has established that the contract is not perfect or valid until the signing of a formal document called escritura p

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Close
E-mail It